The Best Tennis Players are born in September: great gift on any occasion. You can fill the notebook with all of your most precious thoughts, plans. «cm x. Best Tennis players are born in monstercops.comd Edition Tee available in different colors and styles, choose your favorite one from the available products menù. monstercops.com - Live Scores, Tennis News, Player Ranking, and Complete Most Weeks at ATP Top 10; Active players Rank Country Name Weeks At Top 10;.
world's best tennis players mattBest Tennis players are born in monstercops.comd Edition Tee available in different colors and styles, choose your favorite one from the available products menù. Subcategorized are those who represented East Germany and West Germany. Contents. Top · 0–9 · A B C D E F G H I J K L M. monstercops.com - Live Scores, Tennis News, Player Ranking, and Complete Most Weeks at ATP Top 10; Active players Rank Country Name Weeks At Top 10;.
Best Tennis Players FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS VideoTop 10 Tennis Players of All Time 10/11/ · It was then that tennis really became more of a mainstream sport than a sport for the privileged, especially here in the United States. With the likes of Jimmy Connors, Bjorn Borg, John McEnroe, Chris Evert, and others, there were plenty of personalities to fuel the rivalries that took place on and off the court. 3/9/ · Each of the players reviewed on this list is incredible and could arguably be labeled the best tennis player of all time in their own right. Numerically, Roger Federer has won the most Men’s Single Grand Slam titles, while Serena Williams technically outpaces him . Official tennis singles rankings of men's professional tennis on the ATP Tour, featuring Novak Djokovic, Rafael Nadal, Roger Federer, Dominic Thiem and more. Marton Fucsovics. Steve Johnson. Andy Murray Getty Images. Face the facts Gonzalo. I do think that Federer and Nadal are the cream of the crop, although it is difficult to compare players of different generations and playing styles. With the exception of the Coronavirus, most top players build their tennis career around playing the Grand Slam tournaments and anything else they may achieve is simply a bonus, not the main priority Eintracht Frankfurt Gegen Köln them. Congratulations Mickey Donev. Yoshihito Nishioka. He had his prime in the 60s and was ranked No. I am now highly pro Roger Federer Keno Chancen this player has always Sport-Auktion a full professional conduct, probably better than most. Believe me, the top tennis players only really care who wins the most Grand Slam singles titles. That is a career to be envied. Tennys Sandgren. Hard to argue with that back then with a record holding 14 grand slam titles. Nadal is not a cheater. May the best of those 3 players end Tänzer Bei LetS Dance with the most Grand Slam singles titles. He was the first ever south American to ever win a grand slam title, and at his retirement day, he had scraped up 4 grand Best Tennis Players Cmc Markets Erfahrung Auszahlung.
They are unproven in a Tennis environment. There is no such thing as a GOAT. You cannot compare different eras, no matter what statistical data you wish to use.
I strongly believe you can only go by who ends up with the most Grand Slam singles titles after all 3 have retired.
I shall keep repeating that over and over again. Ivan Lendl and I only want to deal with the reality of facts of who ends up winning the most Grand Slam singles titles.
It would not matter to me if you or anyone else in this article were in reality, the best experts in statistical analysis in the world.
Everyone in this article is entitled to their own opinion. Regardless of what you write and I understand this is an article about fantasy GOAT rankings, I still only care about who will end up with the reality of the most Grand Slam singles titles, after all 3 of Federer, Djokovic and Nadal have retired.
It would not matter to me if you or anyone else were the lecturer trying to explain your theory to me in different ways for a whole semester or more.
Ivan Lendl and I are only interested in who ends with the most Grand Slam singles titles. I am not saying you or your anyone else are wrong, I am simply saying I want to see who wins the most Grand Slam singles titles.
GOAT is not even in my vocabulary. When you take under consideration GS titles only - player A wins. For me GS statistics is oversimplified.
The 9th is Agassi with weeks. From the statistical point of view 1 year 52 weeks at No 1 is a very similar achevement to 4 Grand Slams!!!
Of course from the attention of the crowd or commercial matters perspective GS titles are much much more important than ATP rank.
Also players care much more about GS. Nadal is underestimated here. That's why I think Nole has a slightly more chances specially if he develop his attack game near the net like "late" RF did.
There are lot of parameters that were not taken into consideration. GS equals points, Masters , Tour Finals is etc.
You can't just ignore the other big tournaments. Another factor is the success rate. If one player wins 5 GS in 20 years of pro career and another wins the same number of GS in 10 years then my question is, who is better?
Certainly the one who wins them in shorter period of time. I only care about who will end up winning the most Grand Slam singles titles. People seem to take delight in the fact that Nadal has won most of his Grand Slam singles titles on clay.
Stick to your thesis on statistical analysis only. Nadal has still won 7 Grand Slam singles titles away from clay. As previously mentioned, not wanting to sound like a broken record, to me I simply could not care about GOAT.
I only care who ends up winning the most Grand Slam singles titles! Likewise, if any player gets there with mainly all grass and hardcourt Grand Slam singles titles.
I will be celebrating anyway if Nadal is lucky enough to get to 21 Grand Slam singles titles before Federer and Djokovic.
To John: " Tennis GS are played mostly on hard courts and we have to discuss about facts not about theory. Rafael "The King of Clay" Nadal suffers from lack of clay tournaments.
This is the main reason why he has weeks at No 1 comparing to "about " of the RF and Nole. I agree that No of GS is the most important from the tennis point of view factor but staying at No 1 for additional 2 years is a great achivement and should be seriously take under consideration when we talk about GOAT.
Today we have:. ATP rank preferes players who have achivements on all surfaces and are able to obtain a lot of ATP points at a short period of time high density in the certain time.
Sorry for my English. I don't play tennis but my master thesis was from statistics analysis of pharmaceutical data. This is my personal opinion and maybe from tennis point of view is stupid but I analize data and it is more difficult to stay at No 1 for 2 years than to win 1 GS.
Gonzalo, you make a good point but personalities or character should not come into it. If Djokovic ends up with the most Grand Slam singles titles after all 3 have retired, to me he will be the best, but not until he has done it.
Likewise Nadal. Likewise Federer. Djokovic has certainly played the best level of tennis out of the 3 from onwards. Yes, Federer and Djokovic have won more hardcourt and grass Grand Slam titles than Nadal, but Nadal should not be penalised because 2 out of the 4 Grand Slam tournaments are played on hardcourt.
He has still currently won 2 Grand Slam singles titles on grass, his worst surface, at Wimbledon, 1 of which was a win in the final against Federer, whereas Federer and Nadal have currently only won 1 on their worst surface, clay.
It reminded of the Federer v Nadal match ups where Zverev was the Federer with the all court game and Thiem was the Nadal with the great ground strokes and amazing fighting spirit.
Tennis was also the winner. You cannot compare different eras. Anyone who says otherwise is talking complete nonsense! Good luck if you think GOAT is the most important statistic to you.
Other than this article, I have never heard or known of any media outlet mentioning GOAT for any statistics. I have been following tennis for a very long time and tennis commentators in my country always mention Grand Slam singles statistics as their main statistic.
Guess what, Ivan Lendl was Number 1 for a long time too. You and your followers are not. There are far more tennis players who go through their whole Tennis careers without winning a Grand Slam tournament than the ones who do.
It is so difficult for an aspiring tennis player just to make the ATP tour, let alone to support themselves financially in their pursuit.
The competition from other aspirants from many countries is of the highest possible standard. Therefore, I take my hat off to any player who has won just 1 Grand Slam singles title.
You may not be the greatest, but you are still great. I don't care, fun, intellectual or otherwise, I still believe that the total number of Grand Slam singles titles is the Number 1 priority to top professional players.
I am not stopping you or anyone else discussing other what I consider to be less important statistics for your criteria for GOAT. I don't even care about the term GOAT.
Just ask Djokovic, Nadal and Federer what's the most important statistic to them and it's Grand Slam singles titles.
Even when these 3 players have their Zoom chats together, they have all admitted to wanting to win the most Grand Slam singles titles.
Djokovic said that in the media when all 3 of them were in lockdown. Believe me, they are not discussing who is or who will end up being the GOAT, who is number 1, who has won the most ATP tournaments, who has played tennis the longest, etc.
By all means, keep having your fun and your outlet in future comments if you wish but my fun and the Big three's main focus will be who ends up with the most Grand Slam singles titles.
I also don't care if I'm the only person with has this opinion. I shall forever remain solely focused on who ends up winning the most Grand Slam singles titles after all 3 have retired and I will be the 1st person to congratulate whoever that person is.
As a Nadal fan, I couldn't care less about the 1 number ranking, who has been number 1 for the most number of weeks, even if Nadal was that person, to be perfectly honest.
If it makes you happy, leave and name whoever you want as your so called current and future GOAT for all the criteria you have mentioned. I won't lose sleep over it since it means so much to Federer fans.
What will make me happy and has always made be happy is if Nadal ends up winning more Grand Slam singles titles than Federer, regardless of who is nominated and ends up keeping the title of the GOAT.
In other words, if Nadal ends winning more Grand Slam singles titles than Federer after both players have retired, if you or anyone else want to call someone else the GOAT using yours and others criteria, I won't hold it against you or anyone else but I will simply most happy if Nadal ends up with the most Grand Slam singles titles.
But here we discuss about GOAT which is a kind of intellectual game for fun. We take some special factors for example Rod Laver's absence for 6 years in GS and early retirement od Borg.
Keep the faith because at times, Tennis can be a funny game. When you least expect it, good things can happen. Of course, both Nadal and Djokovic have overcome serious injuries in the past to still go on to win more Grand Slam singles titles.
Although 21 Grand Slam singles titles is way out of range for Del Potro now, he could yet win his 2nd Grand Slam singles title, should his body hold up.
He is currently recovering from the knee surgery he had earlier this year. It was only 2 years ago he was ranked than 3 in the world and made the semi finals of the French Open 2 years ago.
He had contemplated retirement but has decided to go on. He has come back from wrist injuries before but this knee injury will be the big test.
He certainly still has the ability to win another major. Tennis Analyst, I agree with you and often think to myself how many Grand Slam singles titles Juan Martin Del Potro would have won, had constant wrist and other injuries not curtailed the majority of his tennis career.
It's a real shame that history will show him only winning 1 Grand Slam singles title. You really need a lot of good fortune to overcome injuries.
His injuries started not long after he beat Roger Federer in the US Open singles final of , aged 20 at the time. He really looked like being the next big thing and an injury free Del Potro definitely had the ability to win at least 21 Grand Slam singles titles in the same era as Djokovic, Nadal and Federer.
I have done a very extensive research on tennis players recently to carefully examine each of the top players.
After examining all of the top players in the last 10 years, I must accept that Novak Djokovic is by far the best tennis player: His atheism and tennis game is superior than the rest of the top players and this by far.
With the fact that Novak is much better than Rafael on hard courts and grass courts, Novak makes his point. What happens is that Novak character is not that of a person with charisma so he is usually not likable.
It is the statistic that matters the most to me. I do not care what anyone else says. If I were a professional tennis player as good as those 3 players, the only evidence I need is Grand Slam singles titles won.
To me, everything else regarding those 3 players is far less relevant. Ivan Lendl, I agree only with you. Rod Laver, who won the calendar Grand Slam twice and missed 6 years at his peak between and having been banned from playing Grand Slam tournaments as he had turned professional and he probably would have ended up with 25 Grand Slam singles titles overall, had he played in Grand Slam tournaments from to inclusive.
Laver was the greatest player of the pre s Open era. Likewise, Monica Seles could easily have ended up with more Grand Slam singles titles than Graf, had Seles not been stabbed.
I can assure people that in 5 to 10 years time and beyond, the tennis history buffs will be looking at the individual Grand Slam singles titles won by each of those 3 players.
As a massive Rafa fan, I just want him to end up with more Grand Slam titles than Federer, because he deserves it in a 5 year less Grand Slam career than Federer.
I would rather listen to, read the opinion and agree with Ivan Lendl than agree with the majority of completely biased and popularity based Federer fans.
Believe me, the top tennis players only really care who wins the most Grand Slam singles titles. However, in the end, she had only 1 Grand Slam singles title to show for it.
Serena Williams could not care less how many WTA tournaments she has won or how long she was Number 1. She just wants to pass Margaret Court on Grand Slam singles titles.
Djokovic is a bit more goal oriented because he mentioned that he also wants to break the record for number of weeks at number 1 but his main priority is to win the most Grand Slam singles titles.
Just show me their Grand Slam singles results and how many Grand Slam singles titles they have won. So, I have now come to the conclusion that Federer fans can write all they want about Federer being the GOAT if it gives them a buzz, because I strongly believe that Grand Slam singles titles are what matters the most to professional players.
It's a gap. Nadal would need at least GS titles to claim that he's better than RF. At the same time Nole probably surpass RF's weeks, but disqualification at US Open could cost him much more than only 1 GS title - a place in history.
Only then will that player be known as the Greatest of All Time. Mr Lendl, you are spot on and completely correct with your assessment. Bliss, Grand Slam singles titles are what players are remembered for long after they have retired.
Grand Slam singles titles is the most important thing to the top players. Bliss, every astute tennis person knows that Grand Slam singles titles is the real measure of the greatest men's player of all time.
Your logic is pathetic! Nadal and Djokovic are still playing the game. Nothing you or any other Federer fan will say will convince Nadal and Djokovic fans otherwise!
Even if you and every other Federer fan continually keeps writing that he is the GOAT a zillion times, I and other Nadal and Djokovic fans will continually laugh out loud at those comments because we strongly disagree.
Bliss, Nadal all the way. His Grand Slam singles strike rate is much better than Federer. Grand Slam singles titles are what counts the most.
Every top player knows that. Why do you think Djokovic is putting his health at risk when other top players are withdrawing from the Coronavirus.
So he can win the US Open. ATP decision not to delete rank points from US Open and Cincinnati supports both Nadal and Federer against players involved in those tournaments like Djokovic and many others.
I know that show must attract the crowd, but this decision has also some disadvantages: 1 makes much more difficult to defend No 1 for Nole, 2 increases RF's rank above many young players who play all the time during season.
Ad 1: I hope Nole will be able to stay at No 1 till late , when those points disappear. Ad 2: seed in would prefare strongly RF for first half of the season.
Nadal is a better player than Federer and will go down in history as a better player than Federer. Federer is tennis GOAT for sure.
Huge gap between Federer and the field. Bigger than the majority of sports like Wayne Gretzky in Hockey. Ian, I read that interview with Ivan Lendl too.
It should also be noted what the current strike rates are of all these 3 players in winning their Grand Slam singles titles:. As you can see, Federer has played in many more Grand Slam tournaments than both Nadal and Djokovic, and of course, after the current US Open and French Open, which will both be played shortly, these figures will be updated from the ladder, should there be any significant change.
I completely agree with Ivan Lendl. Rao Srinivas, you forgot to mention the quality of opposition Federer had in the first 5 years of his career, compared to the quality of opposition Nadal and Djokovic had when they started their careers, which was far tougher.
Nadal is a very professional tennis player. He won the calendar Grand Slam twice. That is a career to be envied. There is every doubt that Roger Federer is the greatest of all time.
Nadal and Djokovic have achieved more than Federer did in a 5 year less time period. They, along with Rod Laver are the greatest of all time, not Federer.
Tyran, you seem to take delight in mentioning what Federer did when he was younger. I would argue that Federer would not have won as many Grand Slam singles titles as he did, had both Djokovic and Nadal started their careers at the same time.
Cristian Garin. Alex de Minaur. United States. Filip Krajinovic. Great Britain. Lorenzo Sonego. Hubert Hurkacz.
Adrian Mannarino. Jan-Lennard Struff. Nikoloz Basilashvili. Miomir Kecmanovic. Albert Ramos-Vinolas. Richard Gasquet. Tennys Sandgren. Alexander Bublik.
Jordan Thompson. Alejandro Davidovich Fokina. Marton Fucsovics. Yoshihito Nishioka. Frances Tiafoe. Vasek Pospisil. Jo-Wilfried Tsonga. Feliciano Lopez.
Fernando Verdasco. Dominik Koepfer. He won singles titles, the most in the open era. His strokes were powerful, his conditioning could be said to be perfect and his topspin forehand skill was incredibly instrumental in defeating opponents.
He won a total of 94 singles titles and 6 doubles in his career. One of his memorable achievements, a record of weeks he spent in the number 1 spot in the ATP rankings.
From to , Bjorn Borg was undoubtedly the top player in tennis. After winning 11 Grand Slam singles titles, Bjorn Borg became the first player in the Open era to achieve the feat.
Bjorn Borg won 6 French Opens and 5 Wimbledon titles. Bjorn Borg is one of the few players in tennis who have won 3 Grand Slam singles without losing a set.
In all, he won 64 singles titles in his career. Pete Sampras ended his career in styles after winning the US Open. In total, Pete Sampras won a total of 64 singles titles.
The man dubbed the Rocket was invincible at the commencement of the Open era, but even before the Open era, began in , Rod Laver had already become a household name in the world of tennis.
From — , Rod Laver held the number 1 spot in the world rankings. His singles titles are the most in the history of tennis. The name Novak Djokovic is prominent in modern-day tennis, but his emergence as one of the greatest in tennis comes as no surprise to tennis fans.
The Serb man has won several titles in recent years that his name is synonymous to success in tennis. His wins include the Tour Finals which he has won 5 times and the Davis Cup.
Since Rafael Nadal turned Pro in , he has progressed to become one of the most proficient and prolific tennis players on the planet. He has won 84 singles titles in his career, which is the 4th highest in the open era.
He is currently ranked no. The best in the game, Roger Federer is the man who has always been at summit despite stiff competition from Novak Djokovic and Rafael Nadal.
When you're talking about the best players over a period of decades in any sport, the list is probably going to be long, and highly debatable.
This list includes some of the greatest male tennis players to ever step on the court. And yes, they include those who played pre, though many listed here are among the greatest male tennis players of the open era post-' Vote for the best, vote down any players you don't think deserve a spot up top and of course, feel free to rerank this list however you want.
Debate about who gets the number one spot might get heated, but all of us probably agree that the names listed here should be considered among the best, and in some cases, some of the greatest athletes of all time , regardless of sport.
Now that you've perused this list of the greatest men's tennis players ever, why not vote for the ladies on this list of the greatest women's tennis players of all time , too?
Australian Open: Winner ; Finalist , , , French Open: Winner , , , , , , , , , , , Wimbledon: Winner , ; Finalist , , US Open: Winner , , , ; Finalist Australian Open: Winner , , , , , , , French Open: Winner ; Finalist , , Wimbledon: Winner , , , , ; Finalist US Open: Winner , , ; Finalist , , , ,One of the most important athletes right now, Federer, deserves the top place in the list of the greatest tennis players. He has achieved 20 Grand Slam titles till now, a record on its own. Besides winning the title for that many times, he also has the record for participating in the 36 quarterfinals of the Grand Slam. Any list of outstanding male tennis players should include names like Roger Federer, John McEnroe, Rafael Nadal and BjÃ¶rn Borg—as these guys are easily the top tennis players. After Margaret Court, who is the greatest female tennis player of all time with 64 Grand Slam titles (24 in singles, 19 in doubles and 21 in mixed doubles), the second greatest female tennis player of all time is Martina Navratilova, who has 59 Grand Slam titles (18 in singles, 31 in doubles, and 10 in mixed doubles). Jeremy on May 15, The top 3 ATP ranked players as of February are all above 30, with Roger Federer being 38 years of age, Rafael Nadal being 33, and Novak Djokovic being On top of that, the rules for. Considered by many to be the greatest tennis player in history, Aussie Rod Laver (aka “The Rocket”) won tournaments, the most in tennis history, plus 11 Grand Slams, and was No. 1 in the world from to To date, Laver remains the only player to have twice won all four Grand Slam singles tournaments during the same calendar year.